September 12, 2010
This article highlights some salient points regarding fraud exposure for insurers in developing Asian markets. But what I find very interesting about this article is that many of the issue described are the same issues faced by insurers in more mature markets. Take this quote, for example: “Insurers focus their investments on marketing and underwriting departments as opposed to the claim area.” Sound familiar?
Other big challenges: regulatory issues, increased tolerance of and exposure to fraud, lack of established best practices. Sounds like all the same issues that face insurers in any market. The benefit of operating in an emerging market is that leading companies can set precedent, develop the best practices and drive regulatory changes. From a fraud detection standpoint, it’s critical that these companies focus their efforts early on and do not set a negative precedent – that fraud is simply a cost of doing business – like we’ve done in the US and other established insurance markets. Over the last couple decades, we’ve been trying to dig ourselves out of that hole, and the process is proving costly and very cumbersome. My suggestion to insurers entering emerging markets: make anti-fraud programs a key component of your strategy so you don’t have to play catch-up later.
July 24, 2010
I wrote about the use of social media as a source of intelligence for investigations some time ago. More and more investigators are leveraging sites like Facebook and Twitter to research their subjects. But, Investigators need to be careful about their use of such services and make sure they don’t run afoul of terms of service violations. This is largely uncharted legal territory and the Lori Drew case was a warning shot across the Investigator’s bow. Now there is a serious question about whether or not a violation of terms of service constitutes a criminal act or is just a civil matter (check this out). But either way, investigators need to tread lightly.
July 23, 2010
It’s been about 6 months since my last post. I’ve been on hiatus while starting a new job as the Principal for insurance fraud solutions at SAS. I also got hooked on Twitter. But I’ll be posting here more frequently in the coming months. Thanks!
January 9, 2010
Requests for medical marijuana have skyrocketed. Some reports estimate an increase anywhere between 50% and 300% since President Obama took office and indicated that he wouldn’t override state laws with federal ones as the Bush administration did.
In November, the American Medical Association changed it’s tune with regard to the potential medical benefits of marijuana. The AMA “urges that marijuana’s status as a federal Schedule I controlled substance be reviewed with the goal of facilitating the conduct of clinical research and development of cannabinoid-based medicines.” The statement indicates that the AMA is not endorsing legalization of marijuana but that further research is warranted.
The announcement comes exactly one year after the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act was voted into effect. According to the Michigan Medical Marihuana Program (MMMP) website, more than 12,000 people have registered for the program since it’s inception – an average of 71 applications per day!
Perhaps marijuana does have medicinal benefits. But can such programs contribute to an increase in fraud? You bet. Unscrupulous workers seeking a little relaxation may be inclined to fake a workplace injury, begin receiving workers compensation benefits and get a doctor to prescribe some cannabis for their “ailment”. What’s better than a paid vacation from work – especially when that vacation comes with a free pass to get high? Insurance fraud with a bonus.
November 28, 2009
Earlier this year, a Connecticut court upheld an arson conviction for Randal Licari. The fire, which destroyed Licari’s home and resulted in a large insurance payment, occurred during the holiday season and appeared to involve a Christmas tree. Initially, fire investigators could not determine the cause of the fire but stated it seemed ‘‘to be accidental in nature and more probably than not caused by the Christmas tree.’’ It turns out that Licari’s Christmas tree was freshly purchased and well hydrated and therefore could not have accidentally caught fire. Further investigation revealed that he had placed Duraflame logs under the Christmas tree and lit them. Licari did not have a fireplace in his home.
This case is a reminder that although Christmas trees can start fires (the National Fire Protection Association estimates about 210 Christmas tree fires per year), the moisture content of a Christmas tree plays a significant role in how hazardous it can be. A DRY tree burns very quickly and will become fully engulfed in flames within 30 seconds. However, a properly hydrated tree will not burn. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conducted several tests and attempted to light a well hydrated tree with a match, electric current attached to an entire matchbook, and an open flame applied with a blow torch (see the test results here with video). The needles burned a bit while the open flame was applied but they self-extinguished quickly. So, this holiday season, if you choose to have a real Christmas tree in your home, remember to keep it well hydrated! And don’t light Duraflame logs directly underneath it.